The letters ch and ll were removed; they are now considered “digraphs.”
The new name of “y” is ye.
The only name for “B” is be.
The only name for “V” is uve.
The only name for “W” is uve doble.
So, as we evaluated potential updates Calico Spanish Classic for Schools, our print curriculum for Spanish-language specialists, this update was a priority (along with adjusting our references to how the color words for “pink” and “orange” are used: see that other post for more information).
…so we updated our song, too.
Our major change to the Classic for Schools curriculum was to incorporate all of our alphabet lessons into the core chapters of the Teacher Manual. Before, each chapter included only one letter, with all the rest included in supplemental lessons in the appendix. Now, all of the official letters are incorporated into lessons in the chapters, with the lessons for “ch” and “ll” moved to the appendix for teachers wishing to do a lesson on these traditional (but eliminated) letters.
Obviously, we couldn’t update our alphabet lessons in Classic for Schools without also providing an updated song for teachers. And in true Calico style, that song is now uploaded on YouTube for all teachers and learners to enjoy. If you’ve been looking for an alphabet that you know reflects the current RAE official one, here it is:
And of course, you’re also always welcome to use our earlier song, based on the traditional Latin American alphabet that you’ll still find in many children’s learning materials.
We’re glad you enjoy our music, and we’re always looking for ways to provide you with what you need to teach well. Enjoy!
How can teachers address proficiency targets while engaging a range of students in traditionally-labeled language levels? This challenge was a reoccurring theme discussed in last week’s #langchat on how traditional world language levels align with proficiency levels. However, #langchat participants shared their strategies for integrating both concepts in the classroom.
Defining what it means to be proficient in various language levels is no easy task. For some, exchanging ‘proficiency targets’ with ‘performance expectations’ seemed to make more sense. Keep in mind that ACTFL proficiency standards measure a speaker’s overall oralproficiency, while the teacher assessing a student in the classroom is measuring that learner’s performance on a particular task, and making this distinction dominated the first part of this #langchat.
What is proficiency?
@SraSpanglish said, “I think when we say proficiency, we’re talking in generalizations based on performances”. @MmeCarbonneau added, “For me, proficiency is what they remember long after the performance has come and gone.” @doriecp said:
Proficiency is also a wide range of topics (both formally studied and not) while performance is only what you’ve practiced.
Level labels Vs. Time Spent in the Classroom
Correlation between students’ proficiency levels and time spent within the classroom is evident for many #langchat teachers. @growingFrench teaches on a “Year-long block schedule” while aiming for the following proficiency levels: “End of Middle School = Intermediate Low, (French II) end of French IV = Intermediate High.” @senioritawoodteaches, “6th 2 days/week, 7th 3 days/week, 8th 4 days/week for 45 min. My target 🎯for [the] end of 8th grade is Novice High.”@Sra_Kennedy said, “I see my #earlylang [students] every other day for 25 [minutes]. My target is Novice Mid with some getting to Novice High but only if they’re there K-5.”#Langchat participants agreed that the longer students spent in the classroom, the higher their achievement. Consistent contact time with students is not something teachers can always control. However, @mlleSulewski kept the chat positive:
Let us not forget that true acquisition can be a slooooooow process.
Addressing Variations in Proficiency Targets Across Programs & Courses
A common reason for variations in proficiency across programs is that students do not all learn at the same pace and often have different language backgrounds and learning abilities. According to @BThompsonEdu, differentiation is a reason for varying proficiency levels; it is important to remember that, “everyone doesn’t need to be at the same place at the same time to improve.”
#Langchat teachers determined the following reasons for variation in language proficiency among students:
@languagehead said, “- [Different] languages will require [different] contact time to reach same [proficiency] level!”
Thank you to all #langchat participants for contributing and sharing your insight and successful classroom techniques.Thanks to Meredith (@PRHSspanish) for leading this insightful chat on how proficiency levels align with traditional levels of world language classes, and to her support moderators, Megan (@MlleSulewski) and Laura (SraSpanglish). Have a topic you’d like to discuss? Don’t forget to check out the #langchat wiki and suggest a topic!